<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/</link>
	<description>Paul V (@640k) on copyright, technology, policy and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=152#comment-53</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by 640k: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#039;s secret, so don&#039;t ask for it. http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ #copycon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by 640k: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#8217;s secret, so don&#8217;t ask for it. <a href="http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ</a> #copycon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=152#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by MissPirata and David McKendrick, Paul V. Paul V said: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#039;s secret, so don&#039;t ask for it. http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ #copycon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by MissPirata and David McKendrick, Paul V. Paul V said: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#39;s secret, so don&#39;t ask for it. <a href="http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ</a> #copycon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=152#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] Addendum: Following up with Trade reveals that there is a mandate, but it&#8217;s secret. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Addendum: Following up with Trade reveals that there is a mandate, but it&#8217;s secret. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
