<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://640k.ca/2010/01/no-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/no-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/</link>
	<description>Paul V (@640k) on copyright, technology, policy and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/no-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=138#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] sent Trade an email asking them to clarify the non-existence of a mandate letter for the ACTA negotiating team. There is one, but it&#8217;s a mandate memorandum. For the record, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sent Trade an email asking them to clarify the non-existence of a mandate letter for the ACTA negotiating team. There is one, but it&#8217;s a mandate memorandum. For the record, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; no mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/no-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; no mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=138#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Anthony Marco, Paul V. Paul V said: More news on #acta in Canada. Trade dept reveals that negotiators have no written mandate: http://bit.ly/61vaxS #copycon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Anthony Marco, Paul V. Paul V said: More news on #acta in Canada. Trade dept reveals that negotiators have no written mandate: <a href="http://bit.ly/61vaxS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/61vaxS</a> #copycon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
