<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Paul V&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://640k.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://640k.ca</link>
	<description>Paul V (@640k) on copyright, technology, policy and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geotagging: A talk at HOPE by airick</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/07/geotagging-a-talk-at-hope/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>airick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=174#comment-81</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ben Jackson and Paul Vet know where you live. Or rather, if you geotag your tweets and photos as carelessly as the average microblogger, they know where you sleep, work, and potentially engage in far more private activities.&quot;

I love US media.
Congrats on your presentation. That&#039;s beyond awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ben Jackson and Paul Vet know where you live. Or rather, if you geotag your tweets and photos as carelessly as the average microblogger, they know where you sleep, work, and potentially engage in far more private activities.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love US media.<br />
Congrats on your presentation. That&#8217;s beyond awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misleading slides in IFPI slideshow by airick</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/03/misleading-slides-in-ifpi-slideshow/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>airick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=162#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Fear is the name of the game.
The IFPI is more concerned with reactionary agendas then business reform.
In fact, the IFPI is letting everyone but their own industry reform the business environment for them.
...I wonder how this might affect the industry. I&#039;m guessing similar to the way iTunes dominates digital distribution.
G&#039;luck Universal, Sony, EMI &amp; Warner. Stay strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear is the name of the game.<br />
The IFPI is more concerned with reactionary agendas then business reform.<br />
In fact, the IFPI is letting everyone but their own industry reform the business environment for them.<br />
&#8230;I wonder how this might affect the industry. I&#8217;m guessing similar to the way iTunes dominates digital distribution.<br />
G&#8217;luck Universal, Sony, EMI &amp; Warner. Stay strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=152#comment-53</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by 640k: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#039;s secret, so don&#039;t ask for it. http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ #copycon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by 640k: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#8217;s secret, so don&#8217;t ask for it. <a href="http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ</a> #copycon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators by Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=152#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by MissPirata and David McKendrick, Paul V. Paul V said: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#039;s secret, so don&#039;t ask for it. http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ #copycon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by MissPirata and David McKendrick, Paul V. Paul V said: Update: Canadian #acta negotiators do have a mandate, but it&#39;s secret, so don&#39;t ask for it. <a href="http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6Ql9pQ</a> #copycon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators by Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/no-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=138#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] sent Trade an email asking them to clarify the non-existence of a mandate letter for the ACTA negotiating team. There is one, but it&#8217;s a mandate memorandum. For the record, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sent Trade an email asking them to clarify the non-existence of a mandate letter for the ACTA negotiating team. There is one, but it&#8217;s a mandate memorandum. For the record, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clarification: secret mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators by Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/clarification-secret-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=152#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] Addendum: Following up with Trade reveals that there is a mandate, but it&#8217;s secret. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Addendum: Following up with Trade reveals that there is a mandate, but it&#8217;s secret. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators by Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; no mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/no-mandate-for-the-canadian-acta-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; no mandate for the Canadian ACTA negotiators -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=138#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Anthony Marco, Paul V. Paul V said: More news on #acta in Canada. Trade dept reveals that negotiators have no written mandate: http://bit.ly/61vaxS #copycon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Anthony Marco, Paul V. Paul V said: More news on #acta in Canada. Trade dept reveals that negotiators have no written mandate: <a href="http://bit.ly/61vaxS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/61vaxS</a> #copycon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACTA complaint to the Information Commissioner by Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; ACTA complaint to the Information Commissioner -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2010/01/acta-complaint-to-the-information-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; ACTA complaint to the Information Commissioner -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=129#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul V, Paul V. Paul V said: My public interest complaint to Canada Info Commish to disclose #ACTA as Trade rejected my access-to-info req http://bit.ly/5xsJ3r #copycon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul V, Paul V. Paul V said: My public interest complaint to Canada Info Commish to disclose #ACTA as Trade rejected my access-to-info req <a href="http://bit.ly/5xsJ3r" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5xsJ3r</a> #copycon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government transparency and the trade department by Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; ACTA complaint to the Information Commissioner</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2009/12/government-transparancy-and-the-trade-department/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V&#39;s blog &#124; ACTA complaint to the Information Commissioner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=100#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] on leaked documents of an unusually secretive process (more info). In December, I wrote about Trade taking a 6 month extension above and beyond the 30 days that the Act permits them to answer my request. However, they did [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on leaked documents of an unusually secretive process (more info). In December, I wrote about Trade taking a 6 month extension above and beyond the 30 days that the Act permits them to answer my request. However, they did [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government transparency and the trade department by Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; Government transparancy and the trade department -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://640k.ca/2009/12/government-transparancy-and-the-trade-department/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Paul V's blog &#124; Government transparancy and the trade department -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://640k.ca/?p=100#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Riz, Paul V. Paul V said: On Access to Information Act delays at the Trade Department. Makes learning about ACTA difficult. http://bit.ly/6o6JO8 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Riz, Paul V. Paul V said: On Access to Information Act delays at the Trade Department. Makes learning about ACTA difficult. <a href="http://bit.ly/6o6JO8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6o6JO8</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
